Use your own project context
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Bring search research into content decisions.
Use keyword discovery, ranking context, competitor research, and supported AI-visibility signals to inform content priorities.
For content teams
Relevant sources
Content decisions become harder when keyword, competitor, backlink, and visibility research cannot be reviewed together.
Teams lose context when keyword, competitor, link, and performance information lives in separate exports.
Manual collection leaves less time for editorial judgment and production.
Research is only useful when a team can connect it to a clear content decision.
Traditional positions and supported AI mentions need separate interpretation and source context.
Use SEONova as a research workspace while keeping editorial production and unsupported automation claims out of scope.
Review available keyword discovery and ranking information for project priorities.
Compare available competitor ranking, backlink, and visibility signals.
Keep supported findings connected to the domain and market being reviewed.
Review supported AI-engine mention runs with prompt and timestamp context.
Use current product evidence and your own requirements to decide whether the workflow fits.
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Review timestamps, provider context, and documented availability before acting on a signal.
Use the pricing and security pages as the source of truth, and confirm custom needs in writing.
This workflow supports research and prioritization; it does not promise automated editorial production.
Start with the Free plan when its published allowances fit. Compare Starter and Pro on the pricing page when you need more projects, seats, keywords, crawls, or reporting eligibility.
Start on the Free plan, connect only the sources you choose, and compare the current allowances before upgrading.