Use your own project context
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Evaluate the product with written scope.
Discuss custom limits, onboarding, integrations, and security requirements with sales, then confirm the agreed scope in writing.
For enterprise
Relevant sources
Enterprise evaluation fails when marketing language is treated as a substitute for current controls and written commitments.
Security, identity, residency, support, and integration needs must be confirmed rather than inferred.
Project, seat, keyword, crawl, and reporting requirements may exceed self-serve tiers.
Pricing and service expectations need a single written source of truth.
Planned controls should remain clearly separated from what is operational today.
SEONova's Security and Pricing pages document the current baseline; sales can discuss additional requirements without pre-claiming them.
Review current controls, sub-processors, disclosure guidance, and clearly labelled roadmap work.
Document project, seat, keyword, crawl, and reporting needs that exceed self-serve plans.
Compare required connections against integrations currently documented as live.
Confirm any custom service, onboarding, or response expectation in the applicable agreement.
Use current product evidence and your own requirements to decide whether the workflow fits.
Evaluate the workflow with the domain, market, and sources that matter to your team.
Review timestamps, provider context, and documented availability before acting on a signal.
Use the pricing and security pages as the source of truth, and confirm custom needs in writing.
Nothing on this page should be read as a certification, SLA, residency, or identity-control commitment.
No. Review the Security page for controls available today. Any additional security, identity, residency, or service-level requirement must be explicitly confirmed in writing.
Share your current requirements and receive written confirmation of the applicable product and commercial scope.